NOTICE AND CLAIM OF LIS PENDENS LIEN
by WRIT OF ATTACHMENT
|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
For the western district of The State of Washington
At The City of Tacoma
No.
C00-5655FDB
Kenneth Wayne, Relator
vs
Territory of Washington dba: State of Washington ; Washington State Bar Association; Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorney; Gary Locke, aka: Gary Faye Locke; John G. Schultz; Dennis W. Cooper; Jan Eric Peterson; M. Janice Michels; John Ladenburg; James Krider; Annette Sandberg; Sgt. Kerwin #142, aka: Robert D. Kerwin; Trooper Mennan #857, aka: Sean L. Meenan; Trooper Depretto #351, aka: Kenneth Depretto; Emerald Towing; ABT Towing, Inc., aka: A.B.T. Towing of Federal Way, Inc.; A-1 Towing.
Grantor(s)
From:
The People of the State of
Washington, ex rel.
Kenneth Wayne, Relator
To:
_______________________________________
Address: ________________________________________
Lien Respondent(s)
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Applicable to all Successors and Assigns
NOTICE TO ALL PERSONS
, known and unknown and all other concerned
parties:
NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES
, Banks, Savings &
Loans, Credit Unions, Lending Institutions Attorney(s) at Law, agents,
successors and assigns, and all other concerned parties:
On
the 13th day of the 11th month of 2000 anno
Domini the
Plaintiff /Demandant filed in the records of the auditor /recorder
of Pierce
county, at The State of Washington, under file # 200011130480, a
Notice and
Claim of Lis Pendens Lien on Tangible, Intangible, and Personal
Property
pursuant to WSL 1893 c 127 § 17 [RCW 4.28.325], against the assets
of the
Defendant(s) /Respondent(s) which are, or may be, in your possession.
Plaintiff
/Demandant filed this Claim of Lis Pendens Lien in the form of a
Writ of
Attachment for the purpose of protecting and securing the equitable
interest
the Plaintiff /Demandant has in said Property and claims the attachment
on
assets as described is in the amount of
Three-Hundred
Billion Five-Hundred Million Dollars ($300,500,000,000.00).
CAUSE FOR THIS ACTION IS AS
FOLLOWS:
Lis
Pendens (Case Pending) pursuant to Washington Session Law 1963 c
137 § 1 [RCW
4.28.325] of The State of Washington regarding the following case
filed in the United States District Court
for the
western district of The State of Washington at The City of Tacoma
, Case # C00-5655FDB.
NOTICE
is hereby given that
Respondents may have one or more of the following assets in your
possession:
1)
Checking
and /or Savings account;
2)
Stocks
and /or Bonds;
3)
Trust
Funds /Accounts;
4)
Safe
deposit and /or Storage Boxes and contents;
5)
Retirement
Funds and /or Pension Funds;
6)
Salary
from Employment;
7)
Compensation
from Insurance Settlements;
8)
Accounts
Receivable including, but not limited to, all contracts, notes,
Real Estate
Lease and /or Rental agreements /contracts, equipment lease and
/or rental
agreements /contracts, etc.;
9)
All
accounts listed in the STATE OF WASHINGTON annual budget, which
is incorporated
herein by reference as if fully reproduced herein;
10)
All
accounts listed in the STATE OF WASHINGTON Comprehensive Annual
Financial
Report, which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully reproduced
herein.
DEMAND IS MADE UPON YOU
, to immediately attach the
same “instantor”.
Demand is made that
you hold as security for Plaintiff /Demandant in the above referenced
action
and do not release any of the above funds, property(s), or documents
until the
above referenced action is settled by negotiation or final determination
by the
supreme court of The united States of America, under rights protected
under the
common law, the Constitution of The united States of America, and
of The State
of Washington.
This
Claim of Lis Pendens Lien in the form of a Writ of Attachment shall
be valid,
any other provisions of statute or rule regarding the form or content
of a
“Notice of Lien” notwithstanding.
The
Claim of Lis Pendens Lien in the form of a Writ of Attachment shall
not be
dischargeable until the above action is settled by negotiation or
final
determination by the supreme court of The united States of America,
nor
extinguishable due to Plaintiff /Demandant’s death whether accidental
or
purposely, nor dischargeable by Plaintiff /Demandant’s heirs, successors,
assigns or executors.
Caveat &
Judicial Notice
:
Notice
to any person, Federal or State Administrative agent(s), Law Enforcement
Officer(s), Legislator(s), or Judicial Officer(s), who attempts
to modify,
circumvent, and/or negate this Notice of Claim of Lis Pendens Lien
in the form
of a Writ of Attachment, shall be deemed outlaws and/or felons and
shall be
prosecuted pursuant to the Public Law as codified at USC 42
1983, 1985, 1986 and subject to fine and
penalties under the Federal Common Law of up to $10,000.00 fine
per individual
and up to 10 year imprisonment pursuant to the Public Law as codified
at USC 18
§
241 & 242.
Notice is given
to all
parties including but not limited to all Courts of all Jurisdictions
that any
judicial actions which violate the rights of individuals protected
by the
constitution may be sued as a cause of action in civil court litigation
against
those performing said acts, without any form of immunity.
Federal and State officials sued in their
capacities are "persons" subject to suits for damages
under Public
Law as codified at USC 42 § 1983; 11th Amendment does not bar such
suits in
federal court.
Any official who
attempts to modify or remove this Notice of Lis Pendens Lien in
the Form of a
Writ of Attachment is fully liable for damages at law pursuant to
the MANDATORY
RULING of the SUPREME COURT.
SEE: [USC
42 § 2000d-7, 2000e(i)]; Hafer v. Melo, No. 90-681, P. 4001(1991);
Butz v.
Ecohomy, 98 S/Ct. 2894: Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678; Bivens v. Unknown
Agents,
400 U.S. 862; Belknap v. Schild, 161 U.S. 10; U.S. v. Lee, 196;
Halperin v.
Nixon (1979) US.
Memorandum of
Law in Support
:
Writs
of attachment are but another form of Constitutional/Federal Common
law
[recognized by U.C.C.] Lien and SUPERSEDE statutory mortgages and
equity liens,
and may be satisfied only when paid and/or property is taken in
lieu of
monetary value and fully satisfied by taking of said property. SEE:
Drummond
Carriage v. Mills, (1878)N.W.99: Hewitt v. Williams, 47 La. Ann.
742, 17 So.
269; Carr v. Dail, 19 S.E. 235; Mcmahn v. Ludin, 58 N.H. 827.
The SUPREME
COURT OF THE UNITED STATES specifically FORBIDS judges from invoking Equity Jurisdiction to
remove Common
Law Liens or similar "clouds on title".
Further, even if a preponderance of evidence displays the lien to
be void or voidable, the Equity Court(s) still may not proceed until
the moving
party has proven that the moving party asks for and comes "to
equity"
with “clean hands” based on the "clean hands doctrine"
and "Power
of Estoppel".
SEE: Rich v. Braxton
158 U.S. 375; Trce v. Comstock, 57 C.C.A. 646; West v. Washburn,
App. Div. 460,
138 NY Supp. 230;
I/We
the undersigned Petitioner(s), verify that all the information and
statements
in this Instrument are true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge
and
belief under penalty of perjury pursuant to the Law of The State
of
Washington, AD 1878. All Statements made herein are made in
good faith and
in the interest of justice.
By
and for:
Sample
__________________________________________
Kenneth Wayne,
Relator
Affiant